Edit Policies and instruments: Hunting licence (Turkey)

You do not have permission to edit this page, for the following reason:

The action you have requested is limited to users in the group: Users.

All fields are optional. Multiple values can be separated by comma.

More information about the individual properties here.

Name of the policy ?:	Hunting licence (Turkey)
Year ?:
Policy area ?:	Agriculture and Rural Development Biodiversity and endangered species policies Food safety Forestry Fruit and vegetable regime Intellectual property rights Plant health and biosecurity Product labelling and packaging Research Programmes Green public procurement
Affected actors ?:	Consumer Landowner/land manager Picker/harvester/hunter Processor Producer/beekeeper Retailer SME Wholesaler
Affected activity ?:	Harvesting/Production Innovation/R&D Marketing/trade SME Use/consumption
Products ?:	All NWFP Bark/cork Berries Christmas trees Foliage Fruits Game Herbs/plants Honey and Bee products Minor fauna Moss Mushrooms/truffles Nuts Other NWFP Resin Vegetable NWFP
Subject ?:	Access Edible NWFP Forests NWFP Nature conservation
Zone ?:
Countries ?:
Regions ?:
Focus ?:	Direct Indirect
Document category ?:	Action plan Convention Directive Fiscal law Fund Instrument Law Policy Programme Regulation Report Resolution Strategy
Instrument type ?:	Regulatory Economic Information
Legal status ?:	Binding Non-binding
Source link:
Full reference ?:
Geographical scope ?:	Local Regional National International
Initiator ?:	Private Public Public/private
Description ?:	'''Brief description of the instrument and its modus operandi''' this instrument is projected to organize hunting in the country. To organize controlling of hunting, to control hunters, to know how many people joint to shoot and how many products shooted. '''Which problem the instrument is supposed to solve?''' 1. Poaching is one of the most serious problem threating animal populations. 2. A detrimental effect on biodiversity both within and outside protected areas as wildlife populations decline, species are depleted locally, and the functionality of ecosystems is disturbed '''Purpose or main objective / overall goal of the instrument?''' Preventing of illegal hunting, controlling of hunters and preventing of informal source loss '''Side objectives/goals of the instrument?''' Making a serious contribution to the national economy with hunting tourism, Halting or decreasing the immigration from rural areas to urban areas, // *improving villagers relationships, '''Innovation content or potential of the instrument?''' There is no a direct innovation content of this instrument '''Which laws and regulations support the implement of this instrument?''' The rescript of NWFP no:4915, Land Hunting Law, hunting license '''The initiator/promoter of the instrument?''' Government agency: General Directorate of Nature Conservation and National Parks '''Which organizations are involved in the operationalization of the instrument?''' General Directorate of Nature Conservation and National Parks with the help of research organizations such as Faculties of forestry and research institutions http://www.ogm.gov.tr/lang/en/SitePages/OGM/OGMDefault.aspx avcılık federasyonu milli eğiti '''How the monitoring is ensured?''' regular forest guards’ surveillance rounds, harvest permits’ register, database of hunters, permit payment receipt… '''How the compliance is ensured?''' fines amount changes based on species, products are confiscated and hunting can be forbidden for hunters who poach '''How is the overall performance of the instrument?''' number of participants is getting increase; area included in the instrument; additional net benefits accrued to landowners and villagers and goverment. There is no spesific quantitatives. '''References''' Huss J., Kahveci O., 2009. Türkiye’de Doğaya Yakın Yapraklı Orman İşletmeciliği. Freiburg-Ankara, OGEM-VAK, // Akıllı S., Katırcıoğlu Y. Z., Maden S., 2011. Kestane Tohumlarının Fungal Florası Üzerinde Çalışmalar. 14–17 Haziran // Türkiye IV. Tohumculuk Kongresi. Ondokuz Mayıs Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi. Cilt 1, sayfa 271–276. Samsun. // Akıllı S., Ulubaş-Serçe Ç., Katırcıoğlu Y. Z., Maden S., 2012. Involvement of Phytophthora spp. in chestnut decline // in the Black Sea region of Turkey. Forest Pathology. Volume 42, Issue 5, pages 377-386. DOI: 10,1111/j. 1439-0329.2012.00770.x. // Karagöz M., Gençsoylu İ., 2004. Aydın li Kestane Yetistirme Alanlarında Zararlı ve Yararlı Türler ve Ekonomik Önemleri. // Samsun.. '''Brief description of the context for the emergence of the instrument''' population in dengeraous- '''Have any of the items mentioned above changed since the instrument entered into force?''' No '''Is there any qualitative or quantitative study of the impacts of the instrument?''' No
Class ?:	Policy Instrument

Summary:

This is a minor edit Watch this page

Cancel

Affected actors	Landowner/land manager + and Picker/harvester/hunter +
Class	Instrument +
Countries	Turkey +
Document category	Instrument +
Encodedname	Hunting_licence_.28Turkey.29 +
Geographical scope	National +
Lcname	hunting licence (turkey) +
Name	Hunting licence (Turkey) +
Products	Game +
Reference ID	552 +
Regions	Bursa Subregion +
Response set	Bursa Instrument A2 - Agent 1 Land +
Year	2003 +