Edit Policies and instruments: Land concession for mushroom picking

You do not have permission to edit this page, for the following reason:

The action you have requested is limited to users in the group: Users.

All fields are optional. Multiple values can be separated by comma.

More information about the individual properties here.

Name of the policy ?:	Land concession for mushroom picking
Year ?:
Policy area ?:	Agriculture and Rural Development Biodiversity and endangered species policies Food safety Forestry Fruit and vegetable regime Intellectual property rights Plant health and biosecurity Product labelling and packaging Research Programmes Green public procurement
Affected actors ?:	Consumer Landowner/land manager Picker/harvester/hunter Processor Producer/beekeeper Retailer SME Wholesaler
Affected activity ?:	Harvesting/Production Innovation/R&D Marketing/trade SME Use/consumption
Products ?:	All NWFP Bark/cork Berries Christmas trees Foliage Fruits Game Herbs/plants Honey and Bee products Minor fauna Moss Mushrooms/truffles Nuts Other NWFP Resin Vegetable NWFP
Subject ?:	Access Edible NWFP Forests NWFP Nature conservation
Zone ?:
Countries ?:
Regions ?:
Focus ?:	Direct Indirect
Document category ?:	Action plan Convention Directive Fiscal law Fund Instrument Law Policy Programme Regulation Report Resolution Strategy
Instrument type ?:	Regulatory Economic Information
Legal status ?:	Binding Non-binding
Source link:
Full reference ?:
Geographical scope ?:	Local Regional National International
Initiator ?:	Private Public Public/private
Description ?:	'''Brief description of the instrument and its modus operandi''' The instruments sets the contractual agreements between NFA and private companies in respect to the rules of picking mushrooms from state forests '''Which problem the instrument is supposed to solve?''' regulation of mushroom picking in NFA forest '''Purpose or main objective / overall goal of the instrument?''' To set rules for the provider (NFA) and buyers (companies that have to organize picking) for the payment of the mushrooms estimated to be extracted '''Side objectives/goals of the instrument?''' To create a formal instrument that could bring more transparency on the selling of mushrooms on the market and to impose some rules for the un-destructive collection of the mushrooms '''Innovation content or potential of the instrument?''' No innovation rather a classical regulatory instrument '''Which laws and regulations support the implement of this instrument?''' Forest Code, 2008 '''The initiator/promoter of the instrument?''' Private companies '''Which organizations are involved in the operationalization of the instrument?''' National Forest Administration Suceava through its local administration units '''How the monitoring is ensured?''' The company has to provide to the NFA the following documents that could allow the control of the picking: a) the position of the acquisition places established by the company for pickers b) names and identifications permits of pickers. c) acquisition bookkeeping with the collected data. d) number plates of the cars which will assure the transportation of the collected mushrooms. e) transportation documents with the amount of mushrooms collected. f) to inform the NFA of any illegal collection done by other firms '''How the compliance is ensured?''' In case that the company is not able to provide proper acquisition and transportation documents the NFA can confiscate the entire quantity and the contract will be cancelled '''How is the overall performance of the instrument?''' The instrument creates the base for companies to document the provenience of the quantities used for processing '''Additional comments''' In practice, the mosaic of properties provides opportunities for other companies to set a contract with a private owner in the same area and in fact to collect mushrooms from state forests in the detriment of the companies which have a contract with NFA. The capability of control of NFA in this direction is reduced so picking is still done chaotically in most of the areas '''References''' Stakeholder consultations – both NFA representative and the owner of a company '''Brief description of the context for the emergence of the instrument''' The need of the processing companies to provide the origin of the mushrooms '''Have any of the items mentioned above changed since the instrument entered into force?''' No '''Is there any qualitative or quantitative study of the impacts of the instrument?''' No
Class ?:	Policy Instrument

Summary:

This is a minor edit Watch this page

Cancel

Affected activity	Harvesting/Production +
Affected actors	Picker/harvester/hunter +
Class	Instrument +
Countries	Romania +
Encodedname	Land_concession_for_mushroom_picking +
Focus	Direct +
Geographical scope	Local +
Initiator	Public/private +
Instrument type	Economic +
Lcname	land concession for mushroom picking +
Legal status	Binding +
Name	Land concession for mushroom picking +
Policy area	Forestry +
Products	Mushrooms/truffles +
Reference ID	578 +
Regions	North East region +
Response set	Suceava Instrument A3 - Agent 3 Pickers +
Subject	NWFP +
Year	2006 +
Zone	South East Europe +