Edit Policies and instruments: Hunters actions for environmental restoration

You do not have permission to edit this page, for the following reason:

The action you have requested is limited to users in the group: Users.

All fields are optional. Multiple values can be separated by comma.

More information about the individual properties here.

Name of the policy ?:	Hunters actions for environmental restoration
Year ?:
Policy area ?:	Agriculture and Rural Development Biodiversity and endangered species policies Food safety Forestry Fruit and vegetable regime Intellectual property rights Plant health and biosecurity Product labelling and packaging Research Programmes Green public procurement
Affected actors ?:	Consumer Landowner/land manager Picker/harvester/hunter Processor Producer/beekeeper Retailer SME Wholesaler
Affected activity ?:	Harvesting/Production Innovation/R&D Marketing/trade SME Use/consumption
Products ?:	All NWFP Bark/cork Berries Christmas trees Foliage Fruits Game Herbs/plants Honey and Bee products Minor fauna Moss Mushrooms/truffles Nuts Other NWFP Resin Vegetable NWFP
Subject ?:	Access Edible NWFP Forests NWFP Nature conservation
Zone ?:
Countries ?:
Regions ?:
Focus ?:	Direct Indirect
Document category ?:	Action plan Convention Directive Fiscal law Fund Instrument Law Policy Programme Regulation Report Resolution Strategy
Instrument type ?:	Regulatory Economic Information
Legal status ?:	Binding Non-binding
Source link:
Full reference ?:
Geographical scope ?:	Local Regional National International
Initiator ?:	Private Public Public/private
Description ?:	'''Brief description of the instrument and its modus operandi''' the provincial hunter associations (210 municipality based association and one provincial coordination), coordinated with forest authority, self-finance their selves (in money or in hours of works for the associated members) for the game environment improvement. The main four actions are: 1-cleaning of abandon meadows and pasture land colonized by the forest; 2-cutting of green alder and mugo pine forest to increase the “in-forest” open areas; 3-specific silviculture techniques to increase the understory and shrubs in the forest; 4- grouse silviculture techniques. Every year the forest authority makes a list of potential forest operation to be done in order to improve the game (and wild animals) environment and stock. '''Which problem the instrument is supposed to solve?''' some little crushes with extreme environmentalist are still going on; none at local level '''Purpose or main objective / overall goal of the instrument?''' improve the game and general wild animals’ environment to increase the stock '''Side objectives/goals of the instrument?''' improve the scenic beauty of the landscape in the permanent alpine meadows '''Innovation content or potential of the instrument?''' improve the output of forest secot with target operations funded by highly motivated forest users '''Which laws and regulations support the implement of this instrument?''' The main law is the Royal Decree 3267/23 (national forest law) then ammended locally with a specific local act (deliberation of the tecnical cometee n. 174 of the 09 june 1995 '''The initiator/promoter of the instrument?''' the forest hunter association '''Which organizations are involved in the operationalization of the instrument?''' hunter association is the promoter of the instruments with forest authority, while green association and ISPRA (national research centre for the environmental studies) monitor the effect of the hunting activity (as well the tool) '''How the monitoring is ensured?''' the forest authority is the one deputed on monitoring '''How the compliance is ensured?''' whether or not the forest operation are done '''How is the overall performance of the instrument?''' locally good, though the impact is relative to other environmental factors that are completely independent on forest operation (i.e. the rainfall during the nesting season decrease dramatically the number of grouse chicks; the high number of mushroom pickers destroy the local grouse behaviours increasing their predation) '''Brief description of the context for the emergence of the instrument''' The pressure of environmentalist groups pushed the hunter to build up a more environmental friedly hunting managemant plan. The mechanism allowed to enhance the stock of game without the investment of public money. '''Have any of the items mentioned above changed since the instrument entered into force?''' No '''What are the main reasons or drivers behind changes mentioned?''' shortage of certain game species like grouses and in general ungulates '''Is there any qualitative or quantitative study of the impacts of the instrument?''' Yes, please specify '''Details''' Yes: (both qualitative and quantitative) annual wild game report and every five year there is a revision of the hunting management plan
Class ?:	Policy Instrument

Summary:

This is a minor edit Watch this page

Cancel

Affected actors	Landowner/land manager +
Class	Instrument +
Countries	Italy +
Encodedname	Hunters_actions_for_environmental_restoration +
Geographical scope	Local +
Lcname	hunters actions for environmental restoration +
Name	Hunters actions for environmental restoration +
Products	Game +
Reference ID	584 +
Regions	Trentino-South Tyrol +
Response set	Italy Instrument A1 - Agent 1 Land +
Year	0090 <sup>JL</sup> +